Nigeria reopens land borders to trade – Kelechukwu Iruoma

3 min read


Summary: The Nigerian government surprised border communities and West African business partners by announcing the closure of borders with neighboring states a few months ago. The goal was to stop food smuggling across the Nigerian borders, which the government claimed was reducing local agricultural productivity. After it became evident that the closures had failed to achieve any of its objectives, the government recently reopened its borders with some limitations in place. Nigerian farmers have long claimed that regional smuggling is holding them back, but since the border closures, they have been unable to meet the huge domestic demand for food, resulting in price spikes for staple foods.


In August 2019, the Nigerian government took border communities and West African trading partners by surprise by announcing the closure of land borders with several neighboring states. 

President Muhammadu Buhari’s goal was to prevent the smuggling of rice and other food items into Nigeria, which the government claimed diminished local agricultural production. The government hoped to encourage Nigerians to purchase local agricultural products, especially rice, in a boost for long-suffering domestic farmers. 

“Buy Nigerian” became Buhari’s mantra, as the president saw the idea as a way of diversifying the economy amid an oil price slump. But in December the government finally reopened border posts, while keeping in place some restrictions on rice and other goods, after it became clear that the closures had not achieved any of its goals.  

The reopening came shortly after Nigeria ratified the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement, which is designed to tear down trade barriers across Africa and usher in a new era of continental free trade. Trade experts had argued that border closures would be a significant bar to the successful implementation of the agreement. 

The border control policy failed in several ways. While the primary aim of the closures was to curtail food imports into Nigeria, they blocked other vital imports and exports from and to Benin, Niger, and Cameroon. Communities along the border and small and medium-sized businesses that trade over the boundaries lost their livelihoods overnight and saw their operations hampered by bureaucracy. 

Nigerian farmers have long argued that they are held back by regional smuggling, but have been unable to meet the huge domestic demand for food since the border closures, leading to price spikes for staple foods. Following the closure, the prices of rice, tomatoes, onions, and other food items began to rise. In August 2019, when the borders were closed, Nigeria’s year-on-year inflation rate was 11.02%. By December 2020 it had risen to 15.75%, the highest rate recorded in three years.

In a country such as Nigeria, where over 50% of household income is spent on food, it was inevitable that the policy would damage the economy as less cash was available for discretionary spending argues Ikemesit Effiong, head of research at SBM Intelligence.

He claims that smugglers merely rerouted their operations to avoid the closure of formal border posts, emboldening the black market at the expense of legal traders. 

An investigation carried out in May between the Nigerian and Benin governments revealed that corrupt security officials were helping to breach Covid-19 movement bans and found evidence of continuing smuggling activities on the Nigeria-Benin border.

“The closure contributed to the rise in inflation,” says Effiong. “The closure removed that stop-gap or margin that importation has always satisfied. When that happens, you begin to see shortages and the prices of food go high.” 

Boost for the economy?

Soon after the border closures, Nigerians and trading partners in neighbouring West African countries began asking the Nigerian government to reopen the borders to prevent further hardship, especially as the Covid-19 pandemic began to bite. 

On 17 December 2020, the Nigerian government approved the recommendation of a presidential committee to reopen the Seme, Illela, Maigatari and Mfun borders. Other land borders were reopened on 31 December in readiness for trading under the AfCFTA, which came into effect on 1 January.

Muda Yusuf, director-general of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry says that the border reopening would provide a boost to the economy alongside the ratification of the AfCFTA: “Many small businesses depend on cross-border trade for a living. Many manufacturers also leverage the Ecowas Trade Liberalisation Scheme (ETLS) to boost their business. Many also source their raw materials from countries in the sub-region.”

Effiong also believes the reopening of borders will boost the economy but will not go far enough to address the structural economic issues Nigeria is facing, which have been exacerbated by the pandemic, restrictive measures and a global oil price slump.

Protectionism is not the solution 

Experts say that agricultural productivity gains must be prioritised at the expense of protectionist policies which seek to cut out foreign suppliers. Road and rail access for farmers and growers remains rudimentary across much of Nigeria, increasing the price of domestic produce and the time it takes to bring it to local markets. Until domestic industry is improved, Nigerian consumers will continue to rely on imports from neighbouring countries.  

“In the immediate short term, Nigeria will have to relax its control on the importation of goods and services,” says Effiong. 

But according to Yusuf, further attempts should be made to reform border policing and overhaul law enforcement institutions, to ensure that smuggling rings are no longer able to dominate regional trading networks. 

“There is a need to strengthen the border policing and management mechanisms to avoid a relapse into the conditions that led to the closure in the first place,” he says. “The biggest challenge with border management is an institutional issue. We need to demand accountability from the institutions that have the responsibility for border policing and management.”


Recommendation(s):

• Priority must entail increasing agricultural productivity at the expense of protectionist policies aimed at eliminating foreign suppliers. In most parts of Nigeria, roads and railroads for farmers and producers are still rudimentary. This increases the price of domestic products and the time required to transport them to the local market. Until the domestic industry improves, Nigerian consumers will continue to rely on imports from neighboring countries.
• There is need to reform border policing and overhaul law enforcement institutions; to ensure that smuggling rings are no longer able to dominate regional trading networks.
• Border control and management mechanisms need to be strengthened to avoid returning to the conditions that caused the closure in the first place.


Source: African Business

Keywords: Border, Nigeria, Security

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

*